Screener
IDVZ vs PID
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PID costs 0.22% less per year.
- PID is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; PID uses index tracking.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | PID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $929M |
| Since | 2024 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 9.72% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -46.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and PID
Explore further