Screener
IEFA vs EFO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.88% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA covers global ex us markets; EFO covers europe.
- IEFA follows a index tracking strategy; EFO uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | EFO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $30M |
| Since | 2012 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.07% | 30.85% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -63.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and EFO
Explore further