Screener
IEFA vs EFU
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.88% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA follows a index tracking strategy; EFU uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, IEFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | EFU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $0.9M |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 5.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | -32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | -23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | -16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | -0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.07% | 31.13% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -90.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and EFU
Explore further