Screener
IEFA vs EFZ
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.88% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EFZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA follows a index tracking strategy; EFZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, IEFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | EFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $16M |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | -15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.07% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and EFZ
Explore further