Screener
IEMG vs EUM
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.86% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEMG follows a index tracking strategy; EUM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EUM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEMG | EUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151.2B | $9M |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 4.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.6% | -32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | -16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | -1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.35% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -38.71% | -67.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEMG and EUM
Explore further