Screener
IFGL vs BFLX
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.08% less per year.
- IFGL follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFGL | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | — |
| Since | 2007 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 3.68% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.68% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.38% | -0.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFGL and BFLX
Explore further