Screener
IFRA vs BNDS
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF vs Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.58% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFRA is classified as equity, while BNDS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IFRA follows a index tracking strategy; BNDS uses multi strategy.
- IFRA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFRA | BNDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $60M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 7.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.82% | 3.60% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -6.95% |
Similar to IFRA and BNDS
Explore further