Screener
IFRA vs PAVE
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.17% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than IFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFRA | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.8% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 18.75% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFRA and PAVE
Explore further