Screener
IFRA vs PIO
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.45% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than PIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFRA covers north america markets; PIO covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFRA | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $281M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.82% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFRA and PIO
Explore further