Screener
IGF vs BILT
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.21% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF covers global markets; BILT covers north america.
- IGF follows a index tracking strategy; BILT uses active selection.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $26M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.43% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and BILT
Explore further