Screener
IGF vs BNDS
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.49% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF is classified as equity, while BNDS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IGF covers global markets; BNDS covers north america.
- IGF follows a index tracking strategy; BNDS uses multi strategy.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | BNDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $60M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 7.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 3.60% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -6.95% |
Similar to IGF and BNDS
Explore further