Screener
IGF vs CNYA
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both IGF and CNYA are equity ETFs. IGF charges 0.39% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: IGF covers global markets; CNYA covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IGF covers global markets; CNYA covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IGF costs 0.21% less per year.
- IGF is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.6B | $242M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.97% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.6% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.52% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -49.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.