Screener
IGF vs DGRO
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.31% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than IGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF covers global markets; DGRO covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, DGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $39.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 2.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -35.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and DGRO
Explore further