Screener
IGF vs DIVB
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.34% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than DIVB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF covers global markets; DIVB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | DIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 11.33% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -36.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and DIVB
Explore further