Screener
IGF vs PAVE
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGF covers global markets; PAVE covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.43% | 18.75% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and PAVE
Explore further