Screener
PAVE vs RIFR
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.12% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAVE covers north america markets; RIFR covers global.
- PAVE follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $42M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.75% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and RIFR
Explore further