Screener
IGF vs URTH
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.15% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $9.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and URTH
Explore further