Screener
IHF vs IGF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF is significantly larger than IHF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IHF covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IHF | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $777M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.4% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.56% | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -35.23% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IHF and IGF
Explore further