Screener
IJH vs CZA
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJH costs 0.64% less per year.
- IJH is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IJH | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119.2B | $184M |
| Since | 2000 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.7% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | -42.18% | -46.18% |
Similar to IJH and CZA
Explore further