Screener
ILCV vs XCHG
iShares Morningstar Value ETF vs Ab US Equity ETF
Key differences
- ILCV costs 0.46% less per year.
- ILCV follows a index tracking strategy; XCHG uses active selection.
- ILCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILCV | XCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $685M |
| Since | 2004 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.94% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.53% | -9.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILCV and XCHG
Explore further