Screener
ILOW vs ACWV
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.30% less per year.
- ILOW follows a active selection strategy; ACWV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ILOW | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.8% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.51% | 7.75% |
| Max drawdown | -10.37% | -28.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ILOW and ACWV
Explore further