Screener
IMF vs ENHI
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
Both IMF and ENHI are alternative ETFs. IMF charges 0.65% a year and ENHI 0.27%. The main difference: IMF follows a managed futures strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- IMF follows a managed futures strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- ENHI costs 0.38% less per year.
- IMF is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMF | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $304M | $12M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.60% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.10% | -5.65% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.