Screener
IMF vs FAAR
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.33% less per year.
- IMF follows a managed futures strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMF | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $301M | $168M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.47% | 13.48% |
| Max drawdown | -15.10% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMF and FAAR
Explore further