Screener
IMF vs IALT
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.34% less per year.
- IMF follows a managed futures strategy; IALT uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMF | IALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $301M | $210M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.10% | -1.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMF and IALT
Explore further