Screener
IMF vs RSIT
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.33% less per year.
- IMF follows a managed futures strategy; RSIT uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMF | RSIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $301M | — |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | managed futures | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.10% | -2.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMF and RSIT
Explore further