Screener
IMFL vs LRGF
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.26% less per year.
- LRGF is significantly larger than IMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL covers global markets; LRGF covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LRGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and LRGF
Explore further