Screener
IMFL vs PFM
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.18% less per year.
- IMFL covers global markets; PFM covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $764M |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 9.62% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and PFM
Explore further