Screener
IMFL vs OMFL
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL costs 0.05% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than IMFL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IMFL covers global markets; OMFL covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, IMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and OMFL
Explore further