Screener
IMFL vs PID
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.19% less per year.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; PID uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | PID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $929M |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -46.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and PID
Explore further