Screener
IMFL vs PWB
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.21% less per year.
- IMFL covers global markets; PWB covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; PWB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +47.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +34.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +18.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 18.57% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and PWB
Explore further