Screener
IMFL vs PWV
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.21% less per year.
- IMFL covers global markets; PWV covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; PWV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 9.41% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -37.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and PWV
Explore further