Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

INDE vs MEMX

Matthews India Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

INDE

Matthews India Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$13M

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

Key differences

  • MEMX is significantly larger than INDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

INDEMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$13M$45M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.95%1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y-5.6%+62.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+25.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.20
Volatility 1Y16.42%21.07%
Max drawdown-22.89%-19.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to INDE and MEMX