Screener
INMU vs GVI
iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF vs iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
Key differences
- GVI costs 0.10% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than INMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INMU | GVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $457M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.37% | 3.56% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.50% | 2.52% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -12.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INMU and GVI
Explore further