Screener
INTL vs EMC
Main International ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF
Key differences
- EMC costs 0.19% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than EMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while EMC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; EMC covers emerging markets.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; EMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | EMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $61M |
| Since | 2022 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 20.21% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -18.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and EMC
Explore further