Screener
INTL vs EMBD
Main International ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.45% less per year.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; EMBD covers emerging markets.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $256M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and EMBD
Explore further