Screener
INVN vs CCNR
Alger Russell Innovation ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.16% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than INVN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INVN covers north america markets; CCNR covers global.
- INVN follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| INVN | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $394M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.2% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -26.01% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INVN and CCNR
Explore further