Screener
IPAC vs BBJP
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Key differences
Both IPAC and BBJP are equity ETFs. IPAC charges 0.09% a year and BBJP 0.19%. The main difference: IPAC costs 0.10% less per year.
- IPAC costs 0.10% less per year.
- BBJP is much larger than IPAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $17.4B |
| Since | 2014 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 4.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.74% | 19.71% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -32.66% |
Similar to IPAC and BBJP
Explore further