Screener
IPAC vs DVYA
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.40% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than DVYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DVYA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $70M |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and DVYA
Explore further