Screener
IPAC vs EEMA
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.40% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 19.95% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and EEMA
Explore further