Screener
RIFR vs PAVE
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.12% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR covers global markets; PAVE covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; PAVE uses index tracking.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 18.75% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and PAVE
Explore further