Screener
IPKW vs RFV
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.20% less per year.
- IPKW covers global markets; RFV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPKW | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $530M | $313M |
| Since | 2014 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.37% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -47.24% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPKW and RFV
Explore further