Screener
IPKW vs RWK
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWK costs 0.16% less per year.
- IPKW covers global markets; RWK covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPKW | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $530M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.37% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -47.24% | -46.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPKW and RWK
Explore further