Screener
IPKW vs RWL
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.16% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than IPKW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPKW covers global markets; RWL covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPKW | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $530M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.37% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -47.24% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPKW and RWL
Explore further