Screener
ISMF vs AOK
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while AOK is a mixed asset ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and AOK 0.15%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while AOK is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; AOK uses active selection.
- AOK costs 0.65% less per year.
- AOK is much larger than ISMF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | AOK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $787M |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | 5.98% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -18.93% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.