Screener
ISMF vs ENHI
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
Both ISMF and ENHI are alternative ETFs. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and ENHI 0.27%. The main difference: ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- ISMF covers global markets; ENHI covers global markets excluding the US.
- ENHI costs 0.53% less per year.
- ISMF is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $12M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -5.65% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.