Screener
ISMF vs BLCR
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while BLCR is an equity ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and BLCR 0.36%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while BLCR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; BLCR uses active selection.
- ISMF covers global markets; BLCR covers North America.
- BLCR costs 0.44% less per year.
- BLCR is much larger than ISMF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | BLCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $6.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +41.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | 16.17% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -21.29% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.