Screener
ISMF vs ENHU
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while ENHU is an equity ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and ENHU 0.22%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while ENHU is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; ENHU uses active selection.
- ISMF covers global markets; ENHU covers North America.
- ENHU costs 0.58% less per year.
- ISMF is much larger than ENHU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | ENHU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $10M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -8.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.