Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ISSB vs XNAV

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF

ISSB

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

Annual cost

1.14%

Fund size

$2M

XNAV

FundX Aggressive ETF

Annual cost

1.27%

Fund size

$34M

Key differences

Both ISSB and XNAV are alternative ETFs. ISSB charges 1.14% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: ISSB follows a option income strategy; XNAV uses active selection.

  • ISSB follows a option income strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
  • ISSB costs 0.13% less per year.
  • XNAV is much larger than ISSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ISSBXNAV
Annual cost (TER)1.14%1.27%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$34M
Since20262002
Dividend yield0.47%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+36.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+24.0%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.03
Volatility 1Y17.40%
Max drawdown-30.57%-24.27%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ISSB and XNAV