Screener
ITA vs QQH
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- ITA costs 0.60% less per year.
- ITA is significantly larger than QQH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ITA is classified as equity, while QQH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ITA follows a index tracking strategy; QQH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ITA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ITA | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.6B | $697M |
| Since | 2006 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.8% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.2% | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.61% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -51.00% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ITA and QQH
Explore further