Screener
QQH vs IDEF
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs iShares Defense Industrials Act
Key differences
- IDEF costs 0.43% less per year.
- IDEF is significantly larger than QQH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QQH is classified as alternative, while IDEF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QQH covers north america markets; IDEF covers global.
- QQH follows a active selection strategy; IDEF uses index tracking.
- QQH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQH | IDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $697M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.79% | 20.65% |
| Max drawdown | -41.87% | -14.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQH and IDEF
Explore further